Variance Ratio: Mean Reversion Tendency

The Variance Ratio test is a statistical method for detecting whether a time series follows a random walk or exhibits mean-reverting characteristics. It complements the Hurst Exponent by providing an independent measure of mean reversion tendency.

The Concept

In a random walk, variance increases linearly with time. If you look at 5-day returns, their variance should be approximately 5 times the variance of 1-day returns. The Variance Ratio tests this relationship.

Variance Ratio = Var(k-period returns) / (k × Var(1-period returns))

Interpretation

Variance Ratio Values
  • VR < 1.0 - Mean reversion: variance grows slower than expected
  • VR = 1.0 - Random walk: variance grows as expected
  • VR > 1.0 - Momentum/trending: variance grows faster than expected

When the Variance Ratio is below 1.0, it indicates that returns tend to reverse—an up day is more likely to be followed by a down day, and vice versa. This is exactly the behavior mean reversion strategies seek to exploit.

Platform Implementation

QuanterLab calculates the Variance Ratio using a 5-period lag. The scoring converts VR values to a 0-100 scale:

  • VR ≤ 0.7 - Score: 100 (strong mean reversion)
  • VR = 1.0 - Score: 50 (neutral)
  • VR ≥ 1.3 - Score: 0 (momentum behavior, not suitable)

Combined with Hurst Exponent

While both metrics detect mean reversion, they use different mathematical approaches. A security showing low Hurst Exponent AND low Variance Ratio provides stronger evidence of mean-reverting behavior than either metric alone.

Platform Weighting

In the daily composite score, Variance Ratio receives a 15% weight, contributing to the overall assessment alongside Hurst (25%), RSI win rate (25%), and other factors.

Advantages of Variance Ratio

  • Simple to calculate and interpret
  • Independent validation of Hurst Exponent findings
  • Directly measures the core property mean reversion exploits

Further Reading

Foundational papers

  • Lo, A. W. & MacKinlay, A. C. (1988). Stock Market Prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test. Review of Financial Studies, 1(1), 41–66.

Textbook references

  • Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W. & MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton University Press.
  • Tsay, R. S. (2010). Analysis of Financial Time Series (3rd ed.). Wiley.

Related QuanterLab articles

Try it in QuanterLab

Variance ratio < 1 confirms mean-reversion tendency; combine it with Hurst < 0.5 in the MR Scanner. Names that pass both filters are stronger candidates than names passing only one.

Back to the Knowledge Base
New research, when it's published

We publish methodology work on validation, overfitting and strategy design. Join the list to hear when a new piece goes out — email only, and you confirm by clicking a link before we ever send anything.

Join the list